For law colleges

Your students are already using AI for legal research.
This one shows its sources.

The problem with a general chatbot in a law school is not that it is unhelpful. It is that it will produce a citation that does not exist, in a format that looks exactly like one that does, and a second-year has no way to tell. LexForge retrieves the judgment first and will only discuss what it actually found — so a student can be marked on the output, and taught to check it.

What a pilot costs

Nothing

A full academic term, every feature, every student, no card and no purchase order. We would rather find out whether your students use it than negotiate before they have touched it. If it turns out to be useful we will talk about what it costs; if it does not, it stops and nothing is owed. Student accounts and their work survive either way — ending a pilot never deletes anybody.

What students get

Moot memorial builder

A memorial is structured before it is written — Statement of Jurisdiction, Statement of Facts, Issues, Summary of Pleadings, Arguments Advanced, Prayer. Students get that structure and a working draft, then argue with it. Where an authority is needed the draft says so in the open rather than inventing one.

Real judgments, quoted as reported

Search runs against Indian Kanoon and India Code and returns actual judgments with their real citations. Nothing is generated to fill a gap — if the search finds nothing, the answer says nothing was found. This is the single hardest thing to get right about AI in law, and it is the reason a student can be marked on what comes out.

The Acts themselves

Search 269 Central Acts in plain language — describe the problem, not the section number — and read the actual text of the section, pulled from India Code rather than paraphrased.

Drafting practice on real formats

Writ petitions, bail applications, legal notices, affidavits, plaints, vakalatnamas — the documents a junior will be handed in their first week and is expected to already know.

Case-law research with an argument

Enter the facts of a problem and get the relevant precedents ordered from Supreme Court downwards, with what each one actually held — the work of an afternoon in a library, done as a starting point rather than an answer.

Works on the phone they already own

It installs to a home screen from the browser. No lab, no licences to manage, no IT request, nothing for the college to run.

How a college is set up

You tell us the college

The form below. A name and an email is enough.

We set it up and send a code

One code for the whole college, usually the same day.

Students type it once

Account → Plan → the code. That is the entire onboarding, and it works with a personal Gmail — no college email needed.

You see what they use

How many signed up, how many are active, and what they actually do with it. Numbers for a committee, not a testimonial.

What it will not do

It does not write a memorial a student can submit unread. The draft is a structure and a starting position; the arguments still have to be theirs, and a judge will find out in thirty seconds if they are not.

It does not give legal advice, and it says so. What it produces is a draft for a qualified person to check.

It does not have every case. Live search covers reported judgments through Indian Kanoon and India Code; district court records and unreported orders are outside it. When a search finds nothing, it says nothing was found rather than filling the space.

Ask about a pilot

Or just ask a question — whether it fits your syllabus, what the students actually see, whether it will survive a moot season.

Or make an account and try it yourself first →